Re: Draft criteria for passing+1 and pasing+2 - comments?
|
I think the normal meaning for “majority” is “more than 50%”, but we can say that directly.
Of course, the other question is, “is that the ‘right’ criterion in the first place?”
--- David A. Wheeler
From: Mark Rader [mailto:msrader@...]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 11:38 PM To: Wheeler, David A Cc: cii-badges@... Subject: Re: [CII-badges] Draft criteria for passing+1 and pasing+2 - comments?
David
While browsing through the list this just caught my eye.
Upgrade: Reporting
Ok, what do we mean by most? 50.1%, 99.9% there is a lot of wiggle room with "majority".
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Wheeler, David A <dwheeler@...> wrote: We have an updated draft set of criteria for “passing+1” and “passing+2”: https://github.com/linuxfoundation/cii-best-practices-badge/blob/master/doc/other.md
These are *not* the final product – but I’d really like to hear comments about them.
I really want to make it *possible* for small projects to get higher-level badges, but clearly *some* activities that reduce risk for users *do* require more people (e.g., for multi-person review, bus factor, etc.). The current draft attempts to make passing+1 possible for small projects, while passing+2 includes criteria that help a project but are not practical for small projects. Well, that was the idea anyway.
--- David A. Wheeler
|
|
|