Georg Link [mailto:linkgeorg@...]: I certainly agree we need to explain it! The way I *currently* resolved that was that I added following to the /projects page, just below the table: I'm

That makes sense. How about displaying the percentage and clarifying what it means in a mouse-over tooltip? Georg

We certainly *could* display them that way, but there’s a lack of horizontal space. The projects table is already really wide. Besides, if you just want to see in progress/passing/silver/gold, we

The percentages as proposed are logical. Could we, instead of going above 100% (more than the whole), display current level plus percentage of next level? Here are examples with interpretation: *

David A. Wheeler: Daniel Stenberg [mailto:daniel@...]: You're absolutely correct, but I think it's okay. It's theoretically *possible* for a project to have a higher percentage in gold than in

But if Zephyr is *also* at the same time 93% of the gold criteria it will still only show 193%, right? That might not be as intuitive... I'm not objecting, just clarifying I guess. -- /

FYI: Up to now the best practices badge’s multi-project display hasn’t clearly shown progress beyond “passing” until the project actually gets silver or gold. It’s also been hard to search

This is an automated monthly status report of the best practicesbadge application covering the month 2018-05. Here are some selected statistics for most recent completed month,preceded by the same

All: John Mertic and Mark Hornick recently suggested to me that there should be a “short intro/motivational video” about the best practices badging project. Basically, in around 5-6 minutes (and

We've recently made some security/privacy improvements to the BadgeApp, and I thought it'd be useful to mention here on the mailing list. In short, we've: 1. Started encrypting email addresses in the

I just realized that I should also add a weird special case: Temporarily-retained backups of logs or databases, which can make our theoretical maximum retention time 18 months (1.5 years). Here’s

Kat passed on the thread -- I won't hijack this thread any more than it has been, but EFF would be happy to join any discussion for making this better. God knows we learned (and re-learned) a lot in

Greetings CII community! The Linux Foundation has connected with a new vendor called Groups.io, which provides mailing list services in a simple but modern interface. Groups.io offers all of the

Luis R. Rodriguez: ... I don't know what can be done, but it's definitely a worthy topic, because media circuses and miscommunication are happening a lot. Unfortunately, for many the economics

I think there's a discussion relating to CII here. I agree this isn't the right place but since there's no general CII discussion list (nor is there really enough traffic for one) - we hijack

Hi! On Tue, 15 May 2018 01:35, mcgrof@... said: Below is a mail I just sent to the gnupg-users list. I hope it shows a bit of that overhyped thing by having a table easy to read in a

As you may know there is tons of media coverage over efail: https://efail.de/ The GnuPG team response seems to indicate that the researchers really didn't properly engage or tune their message to

Sounds reasonable, thanks David.

Georg Link: > It might be helpful to additionally document how long activity logs are kept and when they are either anonymized or deleted. Because the goal "to detect and fix erroneous behavior, as

Thanks David, It might be helpful to additionally document how long activity logs are kept and when they are either anonymized or deleted. Because the goal "to detect and fix erroneous behavior, as