|
LibreOffice got a badge! 3 messages
I’m *delighted* to report that LibreOffice just got a best practices badge! Details here: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/projects/307 for more. I currently review all new passing badge f
I’m *delighted* to report that LibreOffice just got a best practices badge! Details here: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/projects/307 for more. I currently review all new passing badge f
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
New badge: Bareflank hypervisor
All: We have a new badge-holder: Bareflank hypervisor. Details: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/projects/325 It “aims to provide all of the scaffolding needed to rapidly prototype new hyp
All: We have a new badge-holder: Bareflank hypervisor. Details: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/projects/325 It “aims to provide all of the scaffolding needed to rapidly prototype new hyp
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Idea: Email reminders for not-passing, haven't edited in a while 5 messages
We have some badge entries that haven’t updated for a while. Maybe we should start sending reminders. Proposal is here: https://github.com/linuxfoundation/cii-best-practices-badge/issues/487 I’d like
We have some badge entries that haven’t updated for a while. Maybe we should start sending reminders. Proposal is here: https://github.com/linuxfoundation/cii-best-practices-badge/issues/487 I’d like
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Another project with a badge!
We have another badge: MagicMirror. Details: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/projects/347 --- David A. Wheeler
We have another badge: MagicMirror. Details: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/projects/347 --- David A. Wheeler
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Your project does not yet have the "best practices" badge 2 messages
Just received. -- Dan Kohn <mailto:dan@...> tel:+1-415-233-1000 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: badgeapp@... <badgeapp@...> Date: Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:44 PM Subject: Your project does n
Just received. -- Dan Kohn <mailto:dan@...> tel:+1-415-233-1000 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: badgeapp@... <badgeapp@...> Date: Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:44 PM Subject: Your project does n
|
By
Dan Kohn
·
|
|
Email reminders going out! 8 messages
We now have email reminders set to automatically start going out, beginning Sep 8 23:00 UTC. They’ll only go to projects where there’s been no update for at least 30 days, and either no reminders or t
We now have email reminders set to automatically start going out, beginning Sep 8 23:00 UTC. They’ll only go to projects where there’s been no update for at least 30 days, and either no reminders or t
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Is there consensus of when we should consider a particular badging issue as being addressed? 5 messages
Just wondering what everyone's thoughts are about when a project should consider a particular issue related to the badging process to be completed. Can we / should we consider something completed only
Just wondering what everyone's thoughts are about when a project should consider a particular issue related to the badging process to be completed. Can we / should we consider something completed only
|
By Kevin W. Wall
·
|
|
[suggestion] Define patching time frames and ensure security of repositories 6 messages
Dear David and list, I believe a couple of things can be improved in the current CII-badges: 1. Early patching of critical vulnerabilities is not mandated: patching time frames are subjective and vuln
Dear David and list, I believe a couple of things can be improved in the current CII-badges: 1. Early patching of critical vulnerabilities is not mandated: patching time frames are subjective and vuln
|
By
Enos D'Andrea
·
|
|
Thoughts on test coverage criteria for higher-level badges
I’m thinking that perhaps we should add some test coverage measurements for higher-level badges (NOT for “passing”). However, there are many options, and a variety of pros and cons. Below are some of
I’m thinking that perhaps we should add some test coverage measurements for higher-level badges (NOT for “passing”). However, there are many options, and a variety of pros and cons. Below are some of
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Blender now has a badge!!
Great news - Blender now has a badge! Details here: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/projects/286 For those who don't know, Blender is a free and open source 3D creation suite, whose websi
Great news - Blender now has a badge! Details here: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/projects/286 For those who don't know, Blender is a free and open source 3D creation suite, whose websi
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
FYI: GitLab Pages coming to their Community Edition - and it supports HTTPS 3 messages
FYI - The GitLab Enterprise Edition has supported “GitLab Pages” (which serve static pages similar to GitHub pages). Recently GitLab has announced that they’re adding “GitLab Pages” to their open sour
FYI - The GitLab Enterprise Edition has supported “GitLab Pages” (which serve static pages similar to GitHub pages). Recently GitLab has announced that they’re adding “GitLab Pages” to their open sour
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Sourceforge now also supporting https for websites
Even more good news - SourceForge is now also supporting HTTPS for project webistes, which makes meeting criterion "https_sites" even easier for some people. Details here: https://sourceforge.net/blog
Even more good news - SourceForge is now also supporting HTTPS for project webistes, which makes meeting criterion "https_sites" even easier for some people. Details here: https://sourceforge.net/blog
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Repository hosting services' HTTPS support - things are getting much better for criterion sites_https
As you know, most OSS projects today use a repository hosting service (aka "forge"), GitHub being the most popular. This means that many OSS projects have had trouble meeting criterion "sites_https" b
As you know, most OSS projects today use a repository hosting service (aka "forge"), GitHub being the most popular. This means that many OSS projects have had trouble meeting criterion "sites_https" b
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Proposal: For sites_https, allow GitHub pages + custom domain + CloudFlare to implement HTTPS for project site 15 messages
All: *Many* projects use GitHub pages with custom domains, but GitHub does not natively support HTTPS if you’re using GitHub pages with custom domains. I think we should make it clear that using a CDN
All: *Many* projects use GitHub pages with custom domains, but GitHub does not natively support HTTPS if you’re using GitHub pages with custom domains. I think we should make it clear that using a CDN
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Ideas for higher-level badges 6 messages
All: I'd like to start creating the criteria for "higher level" badges. Please reply, or add issues, for things you think should be included. A very early draft is here: https://github.com/linuxfounda
All: I'd like to start creating the criteria for "higher level" badges. Please reply, or add issues, for things you think should be included. A very early draft is here: https://github.com/linuxfounda
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
BadgeApp now upgraded from Rails 4 to Rails 5! 2 messages
FYI, the badging application (“BadgeApp”) has just upgraded from Rails 4 to Rails 5. There were a number of issues that needed to be dealt with; my thanks to Dan Kohn for spearheading the work. If you
FYI, the badging application (“BadgeApp”) has just upgraded from Rails 4 to Rails 5. There were a number of issues that needed to be dealt with; my thanks to Dan Kohn for spearheading the work. If you
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Draft criteria for passing+1 and pasing+2 - comments? 6 messages
We have an updated draft set of criteria for “passing+1” and “passing+2”: https://github.com/linuxfoundation/cii-best-practices-badge/blob/master/doc/other.md These are *not* the final product – but I
We have an updated draft set of criteria for “passing+1” and “passing+2”: https://github.com/linuxfoundation/cii-best-practices-badge/blob/master/doc/other.md These are *not* the final product – but I
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
FYI: BadgeApp had some problems Feb 28 due to Amazon services problems
All: Like many other sites, the “BadgeApp” had problems on Feb 28, 2017. This was due to problems within Amazon services (specifically S3 and other services that depend on it). We missed getting a pro
All: Like many other sites, the “BadgeApp” had problems on Feb 28, 2017. This was due to problems within Amazon services (specifically S3 and other services that depend on it). We missed getting a pro
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Draft passing+1 and passing+2 criteria - feedback wanted!
We have draft criteria for the proposed “higher-level” badges here: https://github.com/linuxfoundation/cii-best-practices-badge/blob/master/doc/other.md We’d love to get feedback (via this mailing lis
We have draft criteria for the proposed “higher-level” badges here: https://github.com/linuxfoundation/cii-best-practices-badge/blob/master/doc/other.md We’d love to get feedback (via this mailing lis
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Should release_notes_vulns be relaxed from MUST to SHOULD? 2 messages
All: Issue #674 proposes to slightly relax the passing criterion “release_notes_vulns”, which currently says: > “The release notes MUST identify every publicly known vulnerability that is fixed in eac
All: Issue #674 proposes to slightly relax the passing criterion “release_notes_vulns”, which currently says: > “The release notes MUST identify every publicly known vulnerability that is fixed in eac
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|