|
Project display
I'm thinking that we can combine at least 2 issues involving project display: https://github.com/linuxfoundation/cii-best-practices-badge/issues/236 (gamification) https://github.com/linuxfoundation/c
I'm thinking that we can combine at least 2 issues involving project display: https://github.com/linuxfoundation/cii-best-practices-badge/issues/236 (gamification) https://github.com/linuxfoundation/c
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Switching to PostgreSQL everywhere 2 messages
I plan to switch the BadgeApp to use PostgreSQL everywhere as the underlying database system. Details below. This will ONLY affect people developing/running the BadgeApp themselves. However, if you're
I plan to switch the BadgeApp to use PostgreSQL everywhere as the underlying database system. Details below. This will ONLY affect people developing/running the BadgeApp themselves. However, if you're
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Criteria changes? 6 messages
If there are any last-minute proposals for criteria changes, please speak up now. We intend to launch the “best practices” project soon. Feedback has generally been very positive (thank you everyone!)
If there are any last-minute proposals for criteria changes, please speak up now. We intend to launch the “best practices” project soon. Feedback has generally been very positive (thank you everyone!)
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Proposal: Make HTTPS a MUST for project website, repo, and download URLs (issue #214) 10 messages
Currently criterion "project_homepage_https" reads: "It is SUGGESTED that the project website use HTTPS, not HTTP. Future versions of these criteria may make HTTPS a requirement. (The badging applicat
Currently criterion "project_homepage_https" reads: "It is SUGGESTED that the project website use HTTPS, not HTTP. Future versions of these criteria may make HTTPS a requirement. (The badging applicat
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Need to clarify project pages vs. project software 2 messages
I’ve recently realized that some of the criteria aren’t as clear as I intended them to be. Projects produce software, and they use websites (etc.) to collaborate developing the software. In some crite
I’ve recently realized that some of the criteria aren’t as clear as I intended them to be. Projects produce software, and they use websites (etc.) to collaborate developing the software. In some crite
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Proposed final criteria additions - and a new "Hide met criteria" button! 12 messages
I’ve pushed to production the criteria additions I mentioned yesterday (not including HTTPS as a MUST). I think all of them have been sitting in the issue tracker for a while, so hopefully they’re not
I’ve pushed to production the criteria additions I mentioned yesterday (not including HTTPS as a MUST). I think all of them have been sitting in the issue tracker for a while, so hopefully they’re not
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Proposed final criteria additions
We’re on the final stretch before the “official” release of the best practices badge. I’m trying to wrap up all proposed changes to the criteria. I didn’t want to change the criteria just before a liv
We’re on the final stretch before the “official” release of the best practices badge. I’m trying to wrap up all proposed changes to the criteria. I didn’t want to change the criteria just before a liv
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Where is the current badge URL? 5 messages
I've filled it out before, but I seem to have lost the web site address, and I couldn't easily figure it out from GitHub or the various news announcements. Thanks! -- Alan
I've filled it out before, but I seem to have lost the web site address, and I couldn't easily figure it out from GitHub or the various news announcements. Thanks! -- Alan
|
By
Alan Robertson
·
|
|
Criteria comments?
We still have a number of potential criteria as open issues. You can see that list here: https://github.com/linuxfoundation/cii-best-practices-badge/labels/criteria Any comments? I’d like to stabilize
We still have a number of potential criteria as open issues. You can see that list here: https://github.com/linuxfoundation/cii-best-practices-badge/labels/criteria Any comments? I’d like to stabilize
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
BadgeApp user interface design 2 messages
Here’s an updated proposed UI for the BadgeApp: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/2z6xdcstf3cn1jn/AACNrN0rTvRZFKEhjfHwFBvBa?dl=0 More details below. If anyone has comments, please comment quickly. --- David
Here’s an updated proposed UI for the BadgeApp: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/2z6xdcstf3cn1jn/AACNrN0rTvRZFKEhjfHwFBvBa?dl=0 More details below. If anyone has comments, please comment quickly. --- David
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Improving the BadgeApp user interface (UI) - issue #222 13 messages
We need to improve the BadgeApp web application user interface (UI). This is issue #222, here: https://github.com/linuxfoundation/cii-best-practices-badge/issues/222 Here are a set of 3 ideas (2 figur
We need to improve the BadgeApp web application user interface (UI). This is issue #222, here: https://github.com/linuxfoundation/cii-best-practices-badge/issues/222 Here are a set of 3 ideas (2 figur
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
CDN seems to work in staging, plan to move to production
The Fastly Content Delivery Network (CDN) seems to be caching the actual badge displays nicely in the “staging” tier, so I plan to move that code to production soon. This is an important step. This me
The Fastly Content Delivery Network (CDN) seems to be caching the actual badge displays nicely in the “staging” tier, so I plan to move that code to production soon. This is an important step. This me
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
FYI: Best practices referenced in LWN.NET article
The LWN.net article “Coverage-guided kernel fuzzing with syzkaller” <https://lwn.net/Articles/677764/> concludes that “... overall, syzkaller appears to be a worthy addition to the battery of kernel t
The LWN.net article “Coverage-guided kernel fuzzing with syzkaller” <https://lwn.net/Articles/677764/> concludes that “... overall, syzkaller appears to be a worthy addition to the battery of kernel t
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
CII-badges Digest, Vol 9, Issue 1
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <cii-badges-request@...> Date: Mar 1, 2016 1:13 PM Subject: CII-badges Digest, Vol 9, Issue 1 To: <cii-badges@...> Cc: Send CII-badges mailing list submis
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <cii-badges-request@...> Date: Mar 1, 2016 1:13 PM Subject: CII-badges Digest, Vol 9, Issue 1 To: <cii-badges@...> Cc: Send CII-badges mailing list submis
|
By
Hector David
·
|
|
Linux Mint, a cautionary tale 2 messages
http://blog.linuxmint.com/?p=2994 Outdated Wordpress site ISO download page in cleartext HTTP. ISO verified with MD5 hash, listed on same cleartext HTTP page. Announcement of ISO compromise on clearte
http://blog.linuxmint.com/?p=2994 Outdated Wordpress site ISO download page in cleartext HTTP. ISO verified with MD5 hash, listed on same cleartext HTTP page. Announcement of ISO compromise on clearte
|
By Tod Beardsley
·
|
|
CII BadgeApp - tiering approach and URLs 8 messages
We’re going to soon start setting up deployment tiers for the BadgeApp. Here’s the current plan… if there are problems, let us know! Just to be clear, this is *not* an announcement that we’re ready. I
We’re going to soon start setting up deployment tiers for the BadgeApp. Here’s the current plan… if there are problems, let us know! Just to be clear, this is *not* an announcement that we’re ready. I
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Terminology: OSS? FOSS? FLOSS? 3 messages
Hanno Böck: > Then one more philosophical issue. The text uses the term "OSS" or "Open Source". I know this is kinda an annoying issue, but this will turn away a certain audience. Given that I want es
Hanno Böck: > Then one more philosophical issue. The text uses the term "OSS" or "Open Source". I know this is kinda an annoying issue, but this will turn away a certain audience. Given that I want es
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
Require supporting alternative crypto algorithms? 5 messages
Current draft criteria: >> "The project SHOULD support multiple cryptographic algorithms, so users can quickly switch if one is broken. Common symmetric key algorithms include AES, Twofish, Serpent, B
Current draft criteria: >> "The project SHOULD support multiple cryptographic algorithms, so users can quickly switch if one is broken. Common symmetric key algorithms include AES, Twofish, Serpent, B
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|
|
(No subject)
Rdarw this berkeley girl named danielle yesterday wanted , my address to send me a google verification for 300 dollars I let her get my phone hers is 510 730 5503 Rdarw smart crew -- Sent fromGeze 209
Rdarw this berkeley girl named danielle yesterday wanted , my address to send me a google verification for 300 dollars I let her get my phone hers is 510 730 5503 Rdarw smart crew -- Sent fromGeze 209
|
By
GEZE Ҩ
·
|
|
Other criteria comments?
We have a number of other criteria proposals. I've created a new GitHub label, "criteria", for proposed criteria changes. You can see all the current ones here: https://github.com/linuxfoundation/cii-
We have a number of other criteria proposals. I've created a new GitHub label, "criteria", for proposed criteria changes. You can see all the current ones here: https://github.com/linuxfoundation/cii-
|
By David A. Wheeler
·
|